-
Hey thanks Silber! Appreciate that…. Recently, i’ve seen some pros work, their photos are all so warm… so orange….. but still, they are quite popular in wedding industry, as for myself, i prefer vibrance instead…. i love saturation…. does warmer photos looks better?
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques : Here’s another shot taken for a lady… i wanted to ask if anyone here could elaborate the term ’photography vision’…. i was told by some pros saying that they couldnt see any vision on my image…. but i was thinking that since everyone’s perspective is different… how [...] · View -
Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: 3 months, 3 weeks ago · View
Here’s another shot taken for a lady… i wanted to ask if anyone here could elaborate the term ’photography vision’…. i was told by some pros saying that they couldnt see any vision on my image…. but i was thinking that since everyone’s perspective is different… how could you simply judge whether one’s photos are bad? Does vision=story telling? if so, how can you tell a story in self portriat? Because self portriat are simply looking at the lens and snap….. really confusing….
-
Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: 3 months, 3 weeks ago · View
-
No, this place was very sunny, the light is very bright there… I used 55mm len, F2.8, ISO100 and Shutter 1/90…
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: This is taken from road side… i tried to let viewers think that this are taken from a forest… · View -
Thanks! Really appreciate! I’ve learned alot!
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques : How do people gauge whether a particular photographer has got a so call ’standard’… does it mean that, if the photos are captured in sharp, clear, perfect color tone, he/she is a good photographer? or can i ask…. is it a MUST for every photo taken, got [...] · View -
oh… its actually not stitch together, because i inserted this two photos without any space in between….. its considered two separated photos….
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: This is taken from road side… i tried to let viewers think that this are taken from a forest… · View -
thanks man! Good job.. i like this picture….
In reply to - Arjun Menon posted an update in the group Photo critiques: Dragon wings…they never spit fire, or come in your nightmares yet we named them Dragons.. Dragon flys’.such a fearful name,for such an innocent lad.His lacy wings are clear as glass,And as delicate as dew.· View -
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques : I just started learning photography for less than a year, i love shoot whenever i am free…. but whenever i ask people for comments on my shoot, they always give the same answer, ’good’….. i believe there’s still room for my improvement…. finally i found siberstudios…. i [...] · View
-
Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: 9 months, 2 weeks ago · View


This is taken from road side… i tried to let viewers think that this are taken from a forest…Well, first of all I’ve got a question to you:
Did you want to stich these two vertical frames together to one horizontal frame ? To the frame, that you present over here ? And if so, why did you do this ? What was your intention, your idea ?oh… its actually not stitch together, because i inserted this two photos without any space in between….. its considered two separated photos….
hi Andy, im new to fashion portfolios, in this image how did you get your lighting soft? did you use a diffuser or there were naturally cloudy skies?
No, this place was very sunny, the light is very bright there… I used 55mm len, F2.8, ISO100 and Shutter 1/90…
Hey Andy, good to see your new work! I like the way you did by putting the two photos side by side, It is a trend now in fashion/portrait photography. IMO, when photographers try this type of presentation, they frequently choose two different ”types” of photos, for example, one being a close up shot of the face, one being a full body portrait. Or one shot being part of the body/clothes, one being a full body shot. I think the two photos should complement each other to tell a full story about the subject. I also think that these two photos should be shot at different angles. Between the two photos you chose, I like the right one more but not so much of the left one…I found the grass a bit distracting…It doesn’t quite match the photo beside it and distract viewers’ attention from the portrait. But that’s just my personal opinion.
-
Hi, thanks for that…. anyway, what does your ’PP’ means? and ’…..Lighting use and sharpness are pretty good for someone who have shot only for a yr……… ’ what does that mean too? thanks!
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques : I just started learning photography for less than a year, i love shoot whenever i am free…. but whenever i ask people for comments on my shoot, they always give the same answer, ’good’….. i believe there’s still room for my improvement…. finally i found siberstudios…. i [...] · View -
how much iso and shutter speed you use for this image?
In reply to - Arjun Menon posted an update in the group Photo critiques: Dragon wings…they never spit fire, or come in your nightmares yet we named them Dragons.. Dragon flys’.such a fearful name,for such an innocent lad.His lacy wings are clear as glass,And as delicate as dew.· View -
Wow! Thanks Ann-Lisa R, for your comments…. alright! I got what you meant…. so, can i put it this way.. every photos should tell a story for the viewer? And if I shoot a image without any meaning, the image is totally meaningless, ya? I under what you are trying to say on positioning of the subject… you are right… i didn’t notice that… using other methods of viewing, i can see that I’ve crop/cut the frame of the image unnecessarily, and of course, the growing of skyscraper on the shoulder… that’s the kind of compliments I need for my improvements… Now, I’ve got another question in mind:
Is it true that NIGHT shooting are the most challenging part for a photographer? Because i do encounter some problem with it like, the lighting.
Is it necessary to use a ’Flash light’? I find that using flash light spoils my image… instead, i use higher ISO, but i know that too much causes NOISE…. sometimes i use wider aperture…. i just don’t like the feel for using FLASH LIGHT…
Lastly, what model of camera do you use? which are the average camera to use to get a professional shoot? what is the things that we must be particular on when purchasing it? I don’t own a camera, i used to rent… usually, Nikon D3X or Nikon D60..
Thanks!
In reply to - Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques : How do people gauge whether a particular photographer has got a so call ’standard’… does it mean that, if the photos are captured in sharp, clear, perfect color tone, he/she is a good photographer? or can i ask…. is it a MUST for every photo taken, got [...] · View -
Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: 9 months, 2 weeks ago · View
by the way, the photos taken are both my friends….. taken with nikon D60 with 55mm lens
-
Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: 9 months, 2 weeks ago · View



How do people gauge whether a particular photographer has got a so call ’standard’… does it mean that, if the photos are captured in sharp, clear, perfect color tone, he/she is a good photographer? or can i ask…. is it a MUST for every photo taken, got to be color graded or touchup in computer? or its not professional to go through computer?Whoey, quite a lot of questions
Questions with answers that can’t be given just with a few words. Questions touching one of the main discussions going on in photography. Well, in my opinion a photo draws the attention of a viewer, when it is based on these conditions (on one of them or sometimes on several of them): there is a message, that is transported, the photos sort of asks the viewer who can give answers to it based on his/her feelings, knowledge, experience etc. – the photo is individually created (either a special composition or sometimes also a special technique). And viewers often react on photos with subjects that are unknown to them, themselves. It is the final photo, that counts, the way, you get there doesn’t matter that much. Thus it might be right out of cam (as it is said) or it might be that post processing and image processing by PC are used as well, e.g. for improving or ”shaping” the last final details e.g. in lighting.
You present a lot of photos over here, thus it is difficult for me, to give a general statement on them. And I wouldn’t like to do that, because I prefer to look at photos each for its own. Well generally I like the way you are working. But there are for sure things, that can be improved. Take the photo with the boy just above, the horizontal frame, where the boy is placed in front of a wall with graffiti. If you look at the right corner at the top of the photo, you’ll see a unique blue triangle. Now this little triangle over there, which isn’t repeated anywhere in the rest of the frame thus has the effect of cutting away a piece of your frame. As if you would take a scissor and cut away one corner of a piece of paper or a photo. Now this is only a little detail within the whole composition, but if you like to improve, try to avoid such triangles at the corners of your frame. There are several ways to do that.
Now in the third photo below with the boy raising up his hands to the sky and the skyscrapers in the background: I like it, it’s telling a message to me and I do like the technique as well. But I think, I would have positioned the boy a little bit different. As can be seen the top of the highest skyscraper is on his left shoulder close to his head. This has a little bit the effect as if the skyscraper grows out out his shoulder. Maybe if the boy had had his head there and hidden this skyscraper thus the background would have remained a background only.
Well, these are some of my first thoughts.
Looking forward to you response.
So far
Ann-LisaWow! Thanks Ann-Lisa R, for your comments…. alright! I got what you meant…. so, can i put it this way.. every photos should tell a story for the viewer? And if I shoot a image without any meaning, the image is totally meaningless, ya? I under what you are trying to say on positioning of the subject… you are right… i didn’t notice that… using other methods of viewing, i can see that I’ve crop/cut the frame of the image unnecessarily, and of course, the growing of skyscraper on the shoulder… that’s the kind of compliments I need for my improvements… Now, I’ve got another question in mind:
Is it true that NIGHT shooting are the most challenging part for a photographer? Because i do encounter some problem with it like, the lighting.
Is it necessary to use a ’Flash light’? I find that using flash light spoils my image… instead, i use higher ISO, but i know that too much causes NOISE…. sometimes i use wider aperture…. i just don’t like the feel for using FLASH LIGHT…
Lastly, what model of camera do you use? which are the average camera to use to get a professional shoot? what is the things that we must be particular on when purchasing it? I don’t own a camera, i used to rent… usually, Nikon D3X or Nikon D60..
Thanks!
Sorry, for answering so late, but at the moment I’m busy working on my website, our http://www.photoakademie.eu/ having just returned from a long trip to Sweden.
Now, let’s try to answer shortly, although this is really difficult, because you raise up one main topic after the other concerning photography.
Nothing can really be answered shortly.
”Every photo should tell a story for the viewer ?” No, this doesn’t have to be like this. There are also stunning photos, that don’t tell stories, like e.g. product photography or experimental or abstract compositions and much more. And such photos can draw the attention of viewers as well.
”Night shots as the most challenging part for a photographer” ? – No, not really. Available light and natural light can be a real great challenge to work with, as well as high contrasts in lighting. In my opinion available/natural light is much harder to work with than nightshots. To answer about ”flash light” and ”ISO” is a book itself
– most important for you at the moment is, if you don’t like the feel for using flash light, don’t do it. And ”nothing is necessary” in photography, do what you like, don’t feel pressed to work like others just because others work like this. But if you like their way of working, if you like their photos and the effects – then study their lighting closely, ask questions and work with it yourself.
Now ”what model of camera” do I use. Another ”hot” topic, which is discussed all over again and again.
Does it really matter ? No, it doesn’t. You can get professional shoots with any camera possible. And first of all one should think about what kind of photography one wants to do – then one should look for a body that is able to realize these dreams and ambitions. And there is much more. So this question can’t be answered over here with a few words. As well as the question what should be particular watched on when purchasing. This depends especially on you and your dreams and ambitions. Just one last advice so far – don’t get into the never-ending quarrels/discussions about trade marks ! That doesn’t help at all – it’s you, who has to work with the camera, which one however.
So far for nowThanks! Really appreciate! I’ve learned alot!
-
Andy Lim posted an update in the group Photo critiques: 9 months, 2 weeks ago · View




I just started learning photography for less than a year, i love shoot whenever i am free…. but whenever i ask people for comments on my shoot, they always give the same answer, ’good’….. i believe there’s still room for my improvement…. finally i found siberstudios…. i want to know what are the comments people give from my work…. thanks!IMO the some of the skin processing are a bit overkill…the plastic feeling to the skin makes the PP very obvious, a great PP on skin should make it smooth and subtle at the same time. Lighting use and sharpness are pretty good for someone who have shot only for a yr. Also you have good angles, keep that up!
Hi, thanks for that…. anyway, what does your ’PP’ means? and ’…..Lighting use and sharpness are pretty good for someone who have shot only for a yr……… ’ what does that mean too? thanks!
PP is my way of saying Post Processing and…well, I was just saying that you did pretty good as a ”young” photographer, by that I mean your photography age…Keep it up! Like to see more of your work in the future for sure.
alright! Noted! Thanks
-











Hi Any, you’re right it all comes down to telling a story. You certainly can tell a story with a self portrait, have a look at Annie Lebovitz’ book a Photographer’s Life, and look at her self portraits. I wouldn’t listen so the criticism about not seeing a vision in your photographs though. Keep shooting and posting, you’re doing great.
Hey thanks Silber! Appreciate that…. Recently, i’ve seen some pros work, their photos are all so warm… so orange….. but still, they are quite popular in wedding industry, as for myself, i prefer vibrance instead…. i love saturation…. does warmer photos looks better?
iAndy, t’s all about your vison and what communicates the feeling and meaning for you, there’s no ”best”